What is this supposed to mean Brent?
Apparently, you've missed all of the posts previously on this thread. The lawsuit that is one of the main reasons for this happening has THE IRVINE COMPANY named as a defendant! Actually, one of its divisions called THE IRVINE LAND COMPANY LLC is named exactly. So either the Irvine Company does in fact OWN the land or at least MANAGES the land.
The cost of rental boats is probably the biggest reason I bought a float tube. Shelling out an additional $55 on top of the entrance fee to fish Irvine is NOT an option. All of a sudden Perris, Vail (coming soon) and the San Diego lakes are starting to look more attractive. Sorry Irvine... when things change I will be back.
I have a question. What about if you prove that you have your own insurance on your boat? That should release Irvine of any responsibilities. Just a thought. Meeeoouuutttt!
It will change back, the big question
Is when-----
Cm
[QUOTE=crappiemike;768052]It will change back, the big question
Is when-----
Hope you are right Cm ! ......
Dang that boat was tiny to be holding 4 people. Hope it does get sold. Chances are better that I'll know someone who lives there than be able to afford to fish there at current prices. Never lived somewhere where almost every good sized lake was privately owned and charged exorbitant fees to fish in.