BeMorWize
01-29-2009, 03:38 PM
Hi Dana (don't know who deleted the thread so I'm writing to you...no offense)
What happened to the report on SARL where an angler got the skunk and alot of FNN'rs had the same story?
I understand that SARL is a paying customer to FNN for marketing.....but why erase something that can shed alot of light for others?
I don't think it's fair (nothing in this world is...) that SARL can lie to anglers, mis-lead them, and because they pay FNN, we can't write stories of how they screw us.
Logically, it might make sense to delete threads like that since they pay FNN...but how does that make FNN look?
So you can do wrong basically and if you have $$$, it will make it right?
YOu know I've been a REG at this lake for ages, as other lakes, but this is the only lake that really cheats....IE NETS at the docks. ONLY LAKE that does this. I still go to SARL because I belive in Change- something they say keeps happening but all we see is the old truth.
I think it would be beneficial to FNN members and even LURKERs to read stories like this, where they say they double stocked and blah blah blah, but when you have 250+ anglers getting skunked, isn't that the true story?
I'm not a biologist, but even I've fished enough to know that if they had been stocked, at least 5 fish would be caught. It doesn't take a "Rocket Scientist" to know that.
What I'm getting at here is that FNN is changing, not for the better either. It seems now that if your paying FNN, no one can say anything negative about your lake and if FNN members do, then we'll pull and delete the thread. Where's the "INTEGRETY" on this?
So it's ok for SARL to rip anglers of 22$ plus outragous prices in the tackle store, but not okay for FNN members to tell it like it is? Wow, i thought the economy is getting bad but FNN also?
Come on Dana, I don't know who deleted the thread but I-for 1, think it would benefit FNN to see stories of SARL....the good and the bad.
Look at the VINE, they got blasted once in awhile and I don't see you guys deleting those threads. Is it because "da Vine" is willing to work with anglers in changing policies etc.... and SARL won't ever change so that's why you guys delete the "negative" posts?
Only got 1 question and I'm off my soap box...
If everyone thought you were crazy and you are the only one that thinks your sane...who is really right? (not you of course Dana but metaphorically)
Meaning, if everyone has the same negative story about SARL and only SARL thinks differently, is it right to say SARL is right and everyone else is crazy? Cuzz by whoever deleting that post...sure made it seem that way.
I hope you understand what I'm getting at. I am in no way blamming you or any editors, just thought it would be nice to have the truth out here when it counts.
What happened to the report on SARL where an angler got the skunk and alot of FNN'rs had the same story?
I understand that SARL is a paying customer to FNN for marketing.....but why erase something that can shed alot of light for others?
I don't think it's fair (nothing in this world is...) that SARL can lie to anglers, mis-lead them, and because they pay FNN, we can't write stories of how they screw us.
Logically, it might make sense to delete threads like that since they pay FNN...but how does that make FNN look?
So you can do wrong basically and if you have $$$, it will make it right?
YOu know I've been a REG at this lake for ages, as other lakes, but this is the only lake that really cheats....IE NETS at the docks. ONLY LAKE that does this. I still go to SARL because I belive in Change- something they say keeps happening but all we see is the old truth.
I think it would be beneficial to FNN members and even LURKERs to read stories like this, where they say they double stocked and blah blah blah, but when you have 250+ anglers getting skunked, isn't that the true story?
I'm not a biologist, but even I've fished enough to know that if they had been stocked, at least 5 fish would be caught. It doesn't take a "Rocket Scientist" to know that.
What I'm getting at here is that FNN is changing, not for the better either. It seems now that if your paying FNN, no one can say anything negative about your lake and if FNN members do, then we'll pull and delete the thread. Where's the "INTEGRETY" on this?
So it's ok for SARL to rip anglers of 22$ plus outragous prices in the tackle store, but not okay for FNN members to tell it like it is? Wow, i thought the economy is getting bad but FNN also?
Come on Dana, I don't know who deleted the thread but I-for 1, think it would benefit FNN to see stories of SARL....the good and the bad.
Look at the VINE, they got blasted once in awhile and I don't see you guys deleting those threads. Is it because "da Vine" is willing to work with anglers in changing policies etc.... and SARL won't ever change so that's why you guys delete the "negative" posts?
Only got 1 question and I'm off my soap box...
If everyone thought you were crazy and you are the only one that thinks your sane...who is really right? (not you of course Dana but metaphorically)
Meaning, if everyone has the same negative story about SARL and only SARL thinks differently, is it right to say SARL is right and everyone else is crazy? Cuzz by whoever deleting that post...sure made it seem that way.
I hope you understand what I'm getting at. I am in no way blamming you or any editors, just thought it would be nice to have the truth out here when it counts.